storewanderer wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 1:24 pm
Another example on this stacking of what appear to be "manufacturer" coupons.
Rite Aid- this week- has a thing on Colgate Toothpaste. It is an in-ad coupon. It says Rite Aid Coupon Offer.
Sale 3.99
In Ad Coupon 2.00-
Coupon at Riteaid.com 2.00-
Final price FREE
Now to dig a bit here.
The in-ad coupon says Rite Aid Coupon offer then in small print says "coupon value paid by manufacturer." Further when I go redeem that coupon in CA I have to pay sales tax on the redemption value so it is clearly coded as manufacturer coupon (not store coupon where the tax would fall off).
Then that coupon at Riteaid.com it too is a manufacturer coupon. In this case you actually need to buy additional items to make both coupons work so in this case I took a .40 candy and my subtotal is .39 (since the -.01 from the 2 coupons got applied to the candy).
So another example of when there is a promotion where 2 of what appear to be manufacturer coupons are being stacked on the same item and this is being promoted right by the retailer in the retailer's print ad.
You bring up some excellent points, but do they apply to Albertsons? The way CVS & Rite Aid handle their promotions is unique -> presumably to limit loss leaders, they would require a paper coupon (at CVS, it printed with your card; at Rite Aid, it came in the paper ad that was mailed to your home--but was often omitted in the paper ad available in store) that was tagged "manufacturers" and stackable.
In recent years, Kroger has acknowledged that "deal hounds" stacking paper and digital coupons was increasingly becoming a problem. They've instructed their cashiers that consumers can stack only one manufactures and one store coupon, whether they were paper or digital. Kroger has instructed its staff that when in doubt, reject the coupon. I play by the rules, and I regularly encounter resistance (and they're not duplicate coupons -> it could be a mailed store coupon that says 'take $1 off any brand cereal, etc.' "Deal hounds" often will often stack identical digital and paper coupons, and when told no, bring up Rite Aid/CVS thing. IMO, Rite Aid/CVS should really modify their policy to conform with the rest of the industry, so people can't plead ignorance.
I briefly re-joined Ralphs as a cashier when I was laid off during the Great Recession. Kroger's coupon policy was clear: you must read every coupon and ensure that consumers are purchasing the items, quantities and sizes specified, and following the rules set forth (e.g. one like coupon per transaction). Corporate was clear that the computer systems were not sophisticated enough to do this. Yet we got an increasing number of consumers who'd bring a $10 off Huggies coupon and insist it was perfectly legal to redeem it on a bottle of Tide, as long as the computer system accepted it. And that was at the beginning of the Mommy Blogger era, shortly before Extreme Couponing took off (which itself regularly committed coupon fraud, although allegedly the production company covered the full cost of the basket, and no coupons were actually redeemed, out of precaution).