CA Senate Bill 478- "Junk fees" bill

This is the place for general and miscellaneous posts on topics which might extend past the boundaries of any specific region. No non-grocery posts.
storewanderer
Posts: 14925
Joined: February 23rd, 2009, 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 341 times
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: CA Senate Bill 478- "Junk fees" bill

Post by storewanderer »

I sure wish more restaurants customers would walk if they find out there is a fee. But most just seem to accept it. Maybe money isn't tight enough yet... if this sort of thing is still being accepted.

But it is also surprising how many people don't ask for a receipt and how many more receive a receipt and don't look at it. I'd guess a significant portion of customers being surcharged don't even know they're being surcharged as they don't see a receipt.
veteran+
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Posts: 2346
Joined: January 3rd, 2015, 7:53 am
Has thanked: 1434 times
Been thanked: 85 times
Status: Offline

Re: CA Senate Bill 478- "Junk fees" bill

Post by veteran+ »

storewanderer wrote: May 7th, 2024, 8:53 pm I sure wish more restaurants customers would walk if they find out there is a fee. But most just seem to accept it. Maybe money isn't tight enough yet... if this sort of thing is still being accepted.

But it is also surprising how many people don't ask for a receipt and how many more receive a receipt and don't look at it. I'd guess a significant portion of customers being surcharged don't even know they're being surcharged as they don't see a receipt.
SPOT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BillyGr
Store Manager
Store Manager
Posts: 1629
Joined: October 5th, 2010, 7:33 pm
Been thanked: 64 times
Status: Offline

Re: CA Senate Bill 478- "Junk fees" bill

Post by BillyGr »

storewanderer wrote: May 7th, 2024, 8:53 pm I sure wish more restaurants customers would walk if they find out there is a fee. But most just seem to accept it. Maybe money isn't tight enough yet... if this sort of thing is still being accepted.

But it is also surprising how many people don't ask for a receipt and how many more receive a receipt and don't look at it. I'd guess a significant portion of customers being surcharged don't even know they're being surcharged as they don't see a receipt.
That may very well be true, but at the same time those customers are also partially at fault for not asking for such a receipt or at least having an idea when their total is more than it should be.
Then again, some simply don't care (or seem not to), just as some will go to a store and buy whatever they see without regards to what it costs, while others will be more cautious, or buy items from different places to save a bit.
ClownLoach
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
Posts: 3186
Joined: April 4th, 2016, 10:55 pm
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 325 times
Status: Offline

Re: CA Senate Bill 478- "Junk fees" bill

Post by ClownLoach »

It is confirmed, as of July 1st all the fees at restaurants must be folded into the menu prices. No more surcharges. No more automatic gratuities either even for large parties. Link to the AG documents in this article. It's very clear.

https://www.timeout.com/los-angeles/new ... 6y3N6xuwTZ
BillyGr
Store Manager
Store Manager
Posts: 1629
Joined: October 5th, 2010, 7:33 pm
Been thanked: 64 times
Status: Offline

Re: CA Senate Bill 478- "Junk fees" bill

Post by BillyGr »

ClownLoach wrote: May 10th, 2024, 10:34 am It is confirmed, as of July 1st all the fees at restaurants must be folded into the menu prices. No more surcharges. No more automatic gratuities either even for large parties. Link to the AG documents in this article. It's very clear.

https://www.timeout.com/los-angeles/new ... 6y3N6xuwTZ
Though it doesn't mean they still can't charge more for paying with a card.

Just list the higher price on the menu, then take off the percentage for anyone who pays with cash (and, of course, note that on the menu, or even on the check if they want to encourage it).
storewanderer
Posts: 14925
Joined: February 23rd, 2009, 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 341 times
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: CA Senate Bill 478- "Junk fees" bill

Post by storewanderer »

BillyGr wrote: May 10th, 2024, 1:05 pm
ClownLoach wrote: May 10th, 2024, 10:34 am It is confirmed, as of July 1st all the fees at restaurants must be folded into the menu prices. No more surcharges. No more automatic gratuities either even for large parties. Link to the AG documents in this article. It's very clear.

https://www.timeout.com/los-angeles/new ... 6y3N6xuwTZ
Though it doesn't mean they still can't charge more for paying with a card.

Just list the higher price on the menu, then take off the percentage for anyone who pays with cash (and, of course, note that on the menu, or even on the check if they want to encourage it).
Yes, that is the reasonable way to do it.

Quit playing games- be honest about the prices.

Is it really that hard to just list the price of your product on a menu in a flat straightforward manner?

If you currently do a 5% surcharge for "health and benefits" and a 3% surcharge for cards just do a menu price increase of 8% and be done with it. Heck, take a 10% menu price increase. Quit playing games and be transparent and straightforward with customers.

The restaurant owners who are fighting this are very out of touch and do not understand their customers.

I also think these surcharges have an adverse effect on tipping. For instance someone who may have left a 20% tip sees these surcharges 5%+3% and decides to only leave a 12% tip.
HCal
Assistant Store Manager
Assistant Store Manager
Posts: 652
Joined: February 1st, 2021, 11:18 pm
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 73 times
Status: Offline

Re: CA Senate Bill 478- "Junk fees" bill

Post by HCal »

storewanderer wrote: May 11th, 2024, 12:39 am
The restaurant owners who are fighting this are very out of touch and do not understand their customers.

I also think these surcharges have an adverse effect on tipping. For instance someone who may have left a 20% tip sees these surcharges 5%+3% and decides to only leave a 12% tip.
Oh, they understand their customers perfectly well. They know that drip pricing works well. That is why it is so common, and why they are so upset about this law.

I totally agree that these surcharges have an adverse effect on tipping. Unfortunately, that doesn't bother the owners at all, since they don't get a cut of tips, and they won't have any trouble retaining staff.
storewanderer
Posts: 14925
Joined: February 23rd, 2009, 3:54 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 341 times
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: CA Senate Bill 478- "Junk fees" bill

Post by storewanderer »

HCal wrote: May 12th, 2024, 11:31 pm
storewanderer wrote: May 11th, 2024, 12:39 am
The restaurant owners who are fighting this are very out of touch and do not understand their customers.

I also think these surcharges have an adverse effect on tipping. For instance someone who may have left a 20% tip sees these surcharges 5%+3% and decides to only leave a 12% tip.
Oh, they understand their customers perfectly well. They know that drip pricing works well. That is why it is so common, and why they are so upset about this law.

I totally agree that these surcharges have an adverse effect on tipping. Unfortunately, that doesn't bother the owners at all, since they don't get a cut of tips, and they won't have any trouble retaining staff.
They understand, until they don't. They've been pulling a fast one on customers who aren't paying attention for years. Unsuspecting tourists (me) who may draw certain conclusions due to political opinions who go in and just assume the "San Francisco Health and Wellness Fee" that pops up at so many restaurants is a city ordinance and pay without question or pushback then find out that is no city ordinance that explicitly dictates they are to surcharge in this manner (the ordinance defines a benefit cost that the employer must pay, if they exceed a certain number of employees, but it doesn't define how to pass it on to the customer). More recently the credit card surcharge thing has exploded. Money is getting tighter for many people due to the cost increases, you will see more and more service businesses/retailers/restaurants report poor results in the coming months due to what has happened. More and more people are watching their budgets more closely. This is a good topic to bring attention to because I think if more consumers knew what was going on, there would be more pushback about it.

The tips may be more relevant to retaining employees when the employees can just go work fast food for $20/hr...
Post Reply