Sam's is far too integrated with Walmart and it benefits both for them to stay that way. DCs are a fixed asset expense for example aside from payroll; Sam's is using the same DC. If Sam's was independent they would not want to use the Walmart DC network and now they would have less utilization of the facility. Same for all of the systems, although Sam's now is the test bed for new technology for the company; if something works well then it rolls out later to Walmart. Basically they're piggybacking on most of the Walmart systems for free and probably could not afford to replace them all on their own. A better way to look at it is this - let's say that together due to the extra volume Sam's puts out with even lower payroll rate than Walmart the SG&A expense is 10%. If Sam's leaves all of the fixed costs in the SG&A are now going to be calculated off a lower amount of sales, and the rate will assuredly be higher. Basically Sam's helps give Walmart leverage for their overhead.arizonaguy wrote: ↑December 18th, 2022, 8:24 amI'm not sure Sam's is a drain on Walmart's resources and I'm not sure an independent Sam's would be a successful chain. A spinoff of Sam's would probably lead to either a merger with BJ's or a chainwide collapse with Costco and BJ's picking up the scraps within 5 years. Sam's is too integrated with Walmart in terms of HR, distribution, vendor purchasing, etc. that it would cost too much to make it an independent entity to make it profitable.storewanderer wrote: ↑December 18th, 2022, 12:39 amI wonder if they could try a format that is part Sam's Club and part Wal Mart pick up (with orders basically handled at another location and brought there). Wal Mart pick up has captured many upper middle class customers who previously did not shop at Wal Mart. One issue I am hearing lately is if there is one issue with pick up and they decide they have to enter the store for any reason (like to go to customer service, or replace a canceled item) the entire experience is ruined for them and they may not do even another pick up again. Wal Mart's in store experience is THAT bad now.ClownLoach wrote: ↑December 17th, 2022, 11:34 pm I'm sure that they want to close another wave of stores. They haven't done a significant wave of closures in at least 4 years?
Also I wonder if they would start closing stores only to reopen as Sam's Club later? Obviously this would be in better neighborhoods. They are finishing up the chain wide remodels/refresh projects and could focus their energy on new stores again. The contrast between Walmart and Sam's has never been bigger. The PNW and San Diego could open up to some of these stores with all of the problems that will erupt if this Kroger-Albertsons merger goes through. This might be their chance to break into "Costco Country."
I still am not convinced they would be opposed to spinning Sam's off to private equity if they could figure out a way to get someone to pay them enough for it. Based on recent performance at Sam's, this may be the time to do that again if they really do want to be rid of Sam's...
I'm not sure we will see Sam's in the PNW again though. It would be very difficult for them to return after they left once.
So a spinoff is not going to happen because of the high costs of acquiring the needed systems and facilities to be independent plus the hit to SG&A. As long as a Sam's Club store is cash flow positive and comp positive then Walmart will want it to be in the system. Really the same goes for a Walmart store. I think they have little to zero tolerance for any negative comp store unless they cannibalized it themselves (which is rare these days since they basically stopped opening new stores). And even less for a money losing store. They would rather just take the big tax write off from closing the losing store. And again since their margins aren't great at Walmart either being a low price, high volume business they have to close stores if they have high shrink.
A private equity sale for Sam's won't work, and furthermore the margins are so narrow at these warehouse stores that the debt the PE acquirer would drop onto the P&L would immediately torpedo the entire company and they would be in bankruptcy immediately. The only way these PE guys guarantee that they make money on their investments is to either borrow money and then make the acquired entity pay it back (so they're not spending their own cash and just reap the profits), or they do use their own cash and set it up as a loan later to be repaid with interest. Basically the profits aren't there for Sam's to be acquired by private equity.
So really the only way Sam's could separated from Walmart would be a sale to a competitor, if one existed who could acquire them. BJs is too regional and I believe they run much lower volume stores. Although Walmart won't break out volume I firmly believe that Sam's is a larger company than BJs because of all of the international stores. Remember Costco has one or two China stores and Sam's has dozens. Sam's also has many stores in Latin America. And Costco would not be interested in such a large merger nor would it be approved by the FTC. Amazon can't even handle Whole Foods after years of owning them and I doubt they would do any better owning Sam's although they do own a lot of infrastructure that could be converted. But they also would have to replace all the merchandise and I doubt they have the clout with vendors to get the same quality and price as Walmart does.
So as much as we all want to speculate on Sam's future, they aren't going anywhere. They will stay attached at the hip to Walmart.
But it is obvious that they are obviously growing their sales at a rapid pace; every Sam's I visit in OC and Riverside County has the same level of traffic as a Costco now. Sam's seems to be busier than Costco in the Las Vegas market too. I was in a Vegas Sam's last week that added a new full service meat counter which was very nice and another innovation for them. Despite sales growth their stores stay under control because of the innovation of Scan and Go on their app. Costco has had to adapt to this to improve their checkout by rolling out self checkout mainly to improve the capacity of their front ends and shorten the lines. In most Costco stores where self checkout was added they kept the same number of full service checkstands and added between 6 and 12 self stations. If the smaller transactions all wind up on self checkout it improves the thoroughput of the entire front end even if the customer is half the speed of the cashier; they still have netted between 3 and 6 additional lanes effectively and usually this is with 2 to 3 more cashiers to supervise. When they jump in and scan for the customer then the productivity improves more. I think Costco knew they really just needed some smaller checkstands to serve as an express lane; they tried using them decades ago and pulled them out because they didn't experience consistent usage and then all the other lanes got longer. Self checkout solved this problem.
Costco has been getting some flack for earnings and sales from Wall Street lately. I think they will say anything but blame Sam's Club for taking some sales. Anywhere that the two compete - it's obvious Sam's is taking share and comping up. Sam's is probably like the $1.50 hot dog for them; if anyone wants to bring up that topic in Issaquah they are going to be thrown through the window.